Last week, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly passed a "regulatory relief" bill that, if enacted into law, will allow banks to branch nationally, regardless of state laws that attempt to restrict such interstate branching. One of the benefits often cited of having a federal savings bank charter, as opposed to a state or national bank charter, is the unrestricted right to open new branches, acquire existing branches, or otherwise engage in the business of "banking" (at least, to the extent allowed by federal law and the regulations of the Office of Thrift Supervision) on a national basis, without regard to state laws.
Since the late 1980's and early 1990's savings and loan "crisis," banking pundits have been predicting the imminent demise of the federal savings bank charter. The industry still lives, and this particular piece of legislation has a long way to go before it becomes the law of the land. However, as another advantage of operating under federal thrift charter appears to be threatened, it has to give supporters of that form of financial institution charter cause for concern.
---Kevin Funnell
We hate to begin a blog directed to financial institution issues with a slightly off-message rant, but have law schools been teaching their lawyers-to-be the rules of professional conduct, in particular Rule 4.2? Recently, we've had more than one in-house counsel on the other side of contract negotiations engage in discussions directly with our client without the client's prior knowledge that opposing counsel would be involved in those discussions and without our, or our client's general counsel's, knowledge or permission. In both instances, opposing counsel was aware that we represented our client and, in fact, the attorneys had exchanged drafts of the contract. In one instance, our client had requested that only business people be present at the meeting and that only business issues be discussed, but the opposing side showed up with counsel and stated at the meeting that they did not want to discuss any matters without their legal counsel being present. Not wishing to appear inhospitable, our clients negotiated the business points with their counterparts but either refused to discuss the legal points with the opposing counsel when he or she broached them, or qualified any tentative agreement reached with the caveat "I'll have to leave that up our legal counsel." The fact that our client was not harmed by this unethical conduct does not excuse it.
Ethical Rule 4.2 is clear. An attorney may not communicate with an opposing party to a matter in controversy that the attorney knows is represented by counsel, about the subject matter of the controversy, without the permission of opposing counsel. The opposing party cannot waive this restriction. This applies to contract negotiations as much as it does to litigation. Ignore it and, when the negotiations are over, you may find yourself facing a grievance.
I am providing the content on this blog solely for the reader's general information. This blog contains my personal commentary on issues that interest me. This is NOT a newspaper; it's a BLOG. Unless otherwise stated, the views expressed on this blog are mine alone, and not the views of any law firm with which I am in any way associated or any other member of any such law firm. Nothing on this blog is intended to be a solicitation of, or the provision of, legal advice, nor to create an attorney-client relationship with me or any law firm. You should seek professional legal counsel authorized to practice law in your jurisdiction before acting on any information contained on this blog. I expressly disclaim any and all liability of any kind or nature with respect to any act or omission based wholly or in part in reliance on anything contained on this blog. I am not authorized to render advice except in the states of Colorado and Texas, and I do not offer legal services to the residents of any jurisdiction where it would be prohibited for me to do so.
Any links that appear on this blog are purely for your information. I'm not making any representations as to their content or, in fact, any other matter concerning them. Merely because a link to a third party site appears on this site doesn't mean that I have reviewed the site and approve it or its content. I don't control any such third party sites and I'm not responsible for their actions, omissions or content. Follow all links at your own risk. If you access any third party site linked to this site or acquire any goods or services from any such third party, you do so at your own risk. I disclaim any liability for any reason connected with any such third party, its site or any goods or services advertised by or ordered or acquired from any such third party.
Communication
You may not form an attorney-client relationship with me or any law firm with which I am associated by the use of this blog, leaving comments to any post, or sending me an e-mail. An attorney-client relationship with me or any such law firm can be established only by entering into a written engagement agreement signed by me or another authorized representative of such law firm. If you do not have an existing attorney-client relationship with me or such law firm, do not send confidential information to me by e-mail links found on this site or by any other means unless you are authorized to do so by me. Such communication will not be subject to attorney-client privilege. If you have an attorney-client relationship with me or such law firm, information that you send to me within the scope of that relationship will be handled in accordance with the applicable Rules of Professional Conduct. However, please be aware that if you send to me any such information by e-mail that is not encrypted, you accept the risk of interception, loss, corruption or lack of confidentiality.
If you do not have an attorney-client relationship with me or such law firm, I may post to this blog or otherwise use all or any portion of any e-mail, voice mail or other communication you make with me including, without limitation, any personally identifiable information that you send to me for any purpose I may deem appropriate in my sole discretion. However, I do not sell, lease or rent personally identifiable information obtained from visitors to this blog solely by reason of their visiting this blog. I may obtain anonymous information on visitors from server logs or third party services that gather information about visitors to this blog. I do not customarily use such anonymous information, cookies or other similar means to attempt to personally identify visitors to this blog, although I reserve the right to do so in my sole and absolute discretion.
I may use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit my blog. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, e-mail address, or telephone number) about your visits to this blog in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
I am not obligated to respond to any e-mail sent to me through this blog or to any comment left on this blog and I disclaim any liability for failing to respond to any e-mail or comment generated by this blog.
Changes
I may change this Disclaimer in whole or in part at any time and from time to time, without notice, by means of, and effective upon, posting the revised Disclaimer to this page. Last update to this page was made on December 5, 2011.
Contact
If you have questions concerning this blog, contact me at the following e-mail address: [email protected].
Comments on this site are a privilege, not a right. If you wish to comment, please make it respectful. I reserve the right, in my sole and absolute discretion, to prohibit all comments, to delete or edit all or any portion of any comment made, and to prohibit (ban) any commenter or IP address from making any comments to this blog. I may revise this comment policy without notice at my sole discretion. If you don't like my comment policy, please do not submit comments. Your submission of a comment consititutes your acceptance of this comment policy as I may revise it from time to time.
Subscribe in a reader
